Comcast is arrogant and insidious to oppose wage discrimination says law professors

Comcast Supports Wage Discrimination

New legislation in Philadelphia aims to prevent discrimination during the hiring process and reverse the disparity in salaries earned by women and minorities compared to white, non-Hispanic men.  Comcast wrote a 25 page memo opposing this.   This fascinating article on http://www.phillyvoice.com shows how far Comcast is willing to go to pay woman and minorities less…

Two local law professors with decades of legal experience say Comcast is taking an “arrogant” and “insidious” position by opposing a pending wage gap ordinance that would bar Philadelphia employers from asking job applicants to disclose their salary history.

The legislation, sponsored by Philadelphia City Councilman-at-Large Bill Greenlee, was approved by a 16-0 vote in early December. It aims to prevent discrimination during the hiring process and reverse the disparity in salaries earned by women and minorities compared to white, non-Hispanic men. Modeled on a similar law adopted by the Massachusetts state legislature in August, Greenlee’s ordinance would become the first of its kind enacted by a U.S. municipality.

Mayor Jim Kenney signaled his support and intent to sign the legislation immediately after City Council’s vote in December, but more than a month after the Title IX amendment to the Philadelphia Code gained passage it’s still awaiting his signature.

“What government is trying to do is something everybody applauds, which is eliminating prejudice, whether it’s on the basis of race, gender or religion.” — Burton Caine, Temple University law professor
A 25-page memo sent to the city’s Law Department could help explain why.

Written by Comcast senior Vice President David L. Cohen and Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce CEO Rob Wonderling, the memo argues the wage discrimination ordinance violates an employer’s First Amendment right to free speech….   Read more here…

 

 

Sex and Race Discrimination at Comcast

Comcast found Guilty of Sex and Race Discrimination
In this article on the Department of Labor website, Comcast was found guilty of systemic hiring discrimination on the basis of race which resulted in the disproportionate rejection of 100 African American, Asian, and Hispanic applicants for call center jobs.   Read the entire article HERE
COMCAST CORPORATION SETTLES CHARGES OF SEX AND RACE DISCRIMINATION
Company will pay nearly $190K in back wages and interest to 96 former and current female employees and 100 minority job applicants; reform hiring practices

SEATTLEComcast Corporation has entered into a conciliation agreement with the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs to resolve allegations of sex and race discrimination.

OFCCP investigators determined that between March 2006 and September 2007 in Everett, Washington, Comcast violated Executive Order 11246 by steering 96 women into lower-paying positions that assisted customers with cable services rather than higher-paid positions providing customer assistance for Internet services because these positions were considered “technical.”

Investigators also established that Comcast disproportionately rejected 100 African American, Asian, and Hispanic applicants for call center jobs because its hiring tests were neither uniformly applied nor validated as related to the job. This resulted in systemic hiring discrimination on the basis of race. Comcast Corporation is a federal contractor.

“Sex-based compensation discrimination and race-based hiring discrimination are not only illegal, they also hurt our economy,” said OFCCP Director Patricia A. Shiu. “We cannot build an economy that works for everyone by depriving women and minorities of opportunities to get ahead.”

determined that between March 2006 and September 2007 in Everett, Washington, Comcast violated Executive Order 11246 by steering 96 women into lower-paying positions that assisted customers with cable services rather than higher-paid positions providing customer assistance for Internet services because these positions were considered “technical.”…  read more